BREEDING EXPERIMENTS. Experiments show that it is impossible to “breed” one species into another species. You hit the “species barrier”.
For further details, click on the following link:-
MALADAPTATION. Darwin stated that “no organ - - - - can arise - - - except through its utility to the species”. However, many features of biological organisms are “maladaptive”.
For further details, click on the following link:-
COAPTATION. If one body part “evolves” to a different format, all the other body parts would need to “evolve” into formats that would “fit in”. This is highly problematical.
For further details, click on the following link:-
IRREDUCIBLE COMPLEXITY. This means that a biological feature cannot evolve by gradual stages, because the intermediate, half-formed stages would have conferred no survival benefit.
For further details, click on the following link:-
PRE-ADAPTATION. In the history of an organism, modifications often appear BEFORE the actual exercise of the function, as if “evolution” could have “foresight”, which it could not (without Intelligent Assistance).
For further details, click on the following link:-
ABRUPT APPEARANCES. The Fossil Record comprises a series of sudden or abrupt appearances of species, without intermediate forms leading up to them.
For further details, click on the following link:-
PERFECTION. Many biological features are too “perfect” to be formed by “evolution”.
For further details, click on the following link:-
IMPOSSIBLE TRANSFORMATIONS. Frequently the “evolution” of one species into another species requires an intermediate stage that would be biologically non-viable.
For further details, click on the following link:-
AESTHETICS. The aesthetic beauty of many organisms cannot be explained by Darwinism.
For further details, click on the following link:-
SURVIVAL OF THE LUCKIEST. Darwinism promotes the notion of “Survival of The Fittest”. However, it is the “lucky” rather than the “fit” who survive.
For further details, click on the following link:-
EVOLUTIONARY OVERSHOOT. Many human features have “evolved” far beyond the requirements of survival.
For further details, click on the following link:-
COMPETITION. Darwinism suggests a competitive biological environment. This is questionable.
For further details, click on the following link:-
IMPOSSIBLE INSTINCTS. Some instinctive animal behaviour is too complex to have “evolved” without Intelligent Assistance.
For further details, click on the following link:-
TRANSITIONAL FORMS. In the fossil record, transitional forms between related species are conspicuous by their absolutely total absence.
For further details, click on the following link:-
EVOLUTIONARY STASIS. In the fossil history, species appear to be extremely resistant to change, which undermines the “Theory of Evolution”.
For further details, click on the following link:-
UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR. According to linguistics expert Noam Chomsky, the human brain contains a special “program” or “blueprint” for the rules of grammar in language. Language only started recently, so insufficient time for this to “evolve”.
For further details, click on the following link:-
CONVERGENT EVOLUTION. Australian marsupial mammals “evolved” from a mouse, but very closely resemble mainland European placental mammals. There is no reason for evolution to “work” TWICE in the same way, unless it is DELIBERATE.
For further details, click on the following link:-
LATENT FEATURES. The genetic machinery needed to make limbs was already present in the fins of a fish. This “latent feature” could provide no survival benefit, and so could not have “evolved” by “natural” means. It had to be deliberately “pre-programmed”.
For further details, click on the following link:-
POLYGENY. Newly developed features cannot be passed on to future generations due to “polygeny”.
For further details, click on the following link:-
HALDANE’S DILEMMA. If a genetic mutation occurs in a herd, then, in order for it to become a feature of the general population, all the other members of the herd must “go extinct”, ie:- leave no progeny. This seems implausible.
For further details, click on the following link:-
POLY-FUNCTIONAL DNA. Most DNA sequences are “poly-functional”. A mutation, if beneficial in one area would be harmful in some other area.
For further details, click on the following link:-
INSUFFICIENT TIME SCALE. Some human features could not have “evolved” in the available time-frame.
For further details, click on the following link:-
EVOLUTIONARY “FORESIGHT”. Evolution would need to have “foresight” in order to “work”. But evolution cannot have “foresight”.
For further details, click on the following link:-
HOMOLOGOUS STRUCTURES. Sometimes a radical reorganization of the DNA “software” occurs, but still producing the same morphological format. This is highly problematical for Darwinism.
For further details, click on the following link:-
THE VARIATION HURDLE.
An animal possessing a variation is likely to breed with another animal that lacks this variation, and so the variation will be "bred out". This is one of the causes of "evolutionary stasis".
For further details, click on the following link:-